THE LOSS OF $15 MILLION WAS JUST THE BEGINNING
We are publishing the following article to remind you of what Diesen and her disciples have foisted upon you, and what was not discussed when NPPM bulldozed through her reappointment. It was reminiscent of Boss Tweed who ran New York City for a few years, but keep in mind, he also went to jail (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boss_Tweed)
DIESEN LOST THE MONEY
AND WE MAY LOOSE OUR UTILITY!
All documents related to the massive losses at the Utilities Commission have been reported by the Utilities Commission Auditors, Brent Millikan, and are available at the Utilities Commission office. At the end of 2003, the Utilities Commission telecommunication division posted a profit of $525,803. When Jeanne Diesen was appointed to the Utilities Commission in late 2004, the telecommunication division showed a profit of $245,414 for the year. After Diesen was appointed, and management changes were made, the Utilities Commission initiated a number of steps changing the strategic plan of the Telecommunication business. These changes were put in place and by yearend; the telecommunication division reported a loss of $862,562. In 2005, the Utilities Commission telecommunication division reported a loss of $3,570,425. In addition to this massive loss, the Utilities Commission pushed back $2,708,593 of 2005 expenses into 2004 and restated 2004 losses. In 2006, the Utilities Commission reported its third massive telecommunication division loss of over $2,205,606.
In summary, and to provide some perspective, prior to Diesen’s appointment to the Utilities Commission the telecommunication division showed a cumulative profit of $771,217. After Diesen’s appointment, the Utilities Commission telecommunication division incurred a loss of over $9,347,233. Source documents available to the public for inspection are Utilities Commission financial statements and audits for fiscal years, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Just the facts:
(1). The coming rate increase will make UC second highest in the state.
There are 37 Electric Utilities in the state of Florida. Prior to Diesen’s appointment,
Utilities Commission rates were below the average and ranked in the lower half of rate
comparison. Their rates are currently the forth most expensive in the state. In
addition, the fuel and purchase power fund has a negative balance of $2,284,237.65.
In other words a third round of rate increases is on the way. Once the rate increase is
approved, UCNSB rates will be the second highest in the state, and by far the highest
in central Florida.
(2). Improper use of fuel adjustment funds.
The Utilities Commission transferred $1,100,000 from the fuel fund to capital and
raised the fuel adjustment to the customer. This is not allowed under the rate tariff.
Capital projects are funded from rates not fuel funds.
(3). Are the missing proceeds from the sale of land west of I-95 being used to
keep UC checks from bouncing?
Acreage west of I-95 was sold for approximately $2,800,000. Proceeds from the sale
were to pay debt that secured the property. Where is the money?
(4). Fiber fiasco.
An operational state of the art fiber optics system, totally paid for, was shut down.
Developers were paying 100% on the cost of conduit for the fiber. Profits from the
system were to offset taxes.
(5). Lack of needed technical expertise.
New customers are not allowed to obtain service from the Utilities Commission
operational wireless internet service installed in 2003. At last report, Diesen has this
service in her home. A new wireless service was installed at a cost of over $250,000,
but was never made operational. The Utilities Commission offered the system for sale
and received a bid for around $3,000.
(6). Payroll out of control.
Staffing levels for high paying middle management personal have been increased, yet
the Utilities Commission had paid out $2,631,478 for outside personal services.
(7). Hidden upcoming rate increases.
Over one million dollars has been transferred from electric funds to water/wastewater
accounts to defer rate increases in those utilities.
(8). City Commission & public not provided complete budget.
The Utilities Commission proposed 2008 O&M budget presented for City approval is a
summary, not a detailed budget, and is comprised of only 12 pages. Details of all
proposed expenditures have not been provided, even though we are concerned that
not all of our City Commissioners would understand it.
The Shadow is seriously concerned about the statements of fact and trends identified above. Sources for the data presented and its analysis are provided for those of you willing to make the effort to confirm them. Reserve and rate stabilization funds, whose purpose was to prevent such rate increases as we have seen over the past year or so, were depleted. Rather than restoring positive cash flow from the telecommunication division it was terminated, rather than restore the fiber system to an operational status, needed assets were sold at a considerable loss. Purchase power contracts were not negotiated to our advantage. As we see it, everywhere you turn there is evidence of actions and events perpetrated by the UC that benefit Bell South and FPL, rather than our ratepayers. Unless this decimation of the UC is stopped, we fear that a ratepayers and or employees’ riot may ensue as they realize the potential for job loss, especially the purchase power gurus asset loss, and further increases in utility bills.