POLICE VEHICLES, GAS, AND COMMUTING
We have been visiting the issue of how money is spent for police vehicles in our fair city off and on for a couple of months. It is a multifaceted issue, but each facet reduces to a factor of cost, and whether the municipality should bear all costs, or whether some costs should be borne by the police officer. Keep in mind, providing a vehicle of any variety, whether a police pursuit vehicle or an antiquated four wheel jeep, is a significant perk for the recipient. Commander Drossman for example, drives a pursuit vehicle that was in an accident but is suitable, dependable transportation even if it is no longer deemed suitable for high speed chases, because someone is concerned that its frame was damaged in the accident. Of course, this question could be resolved quickly by having a local body repair shop make an evaluation. If the frame is bent, and the vehicle is judged to be unsuitable for high speed pursuits, then the question is answered and Commander Drossman could continue to use the vehicle. If it is not bent, then back on the line it goes, and he can drive the Chief’s car.
We do not understand how decisions are made about the use of police vehicles. While the decision to have police officers take their vehicles home may be justified, none seem to include using it as a personal commuting vehicle where significant millage is added to a specialized, expensive vehicle. The usual justification for allowing officers to take a police car home, like the one at the alley on 26th and AIA, is that it projects a police presence, or that an officer provides better care for his/her vehicle when he/she is allowed to take it home, and it lasts longer. We wonder what that says about the character of police officers today, if you must bribe them to take care of city property. Nevertheless, this rationale does not seem to be appropriate when the cars are driven to Pierson, Ormond Beach, or Edgewater. Assuming these vehicles average 20 miles/gallon of gasoline, the vehicle that spends the night in Edgewater and averages 10 miles/day, and uses about 115 gallons of gasoline/year. The Ormond Beach vehicle travels 30 miles/day, and averages 345 gallons of gasoline/year, and the Pierson vehicle that travels 60miles/day, averages 690 gallons of gasoline/year. The argument is put forth that they can not afford to live in New Smyrna Beach, and this is an incentive for retaining their services. Does that mean the City must buy each police officer a $20,000-$35,000 vehicle to retain their services? We believe there is a bigger problem with the police department than meets the eye, and should be resolved immediately! There is little or no merit to this argument since we are sure they can weigh the benefits of the cost of commuting against a position near their homes and at what we are willing to pay, recruiting should not be a problem, unless the hiring process introduces disincentives of its own..
The motor pool provides an annual report to the City Manager of the costs for all vehicles and their operating history. To date, we have not received a copy of this report, but will provide the information when it is made available. In the meantime, we have included the chart below that provides an estimate of the fuel cost borne by the City to effect this perk for these three police officers. Costs do not include capitalization or other operating costs.
LOCATION RT MILEAGE/YEAR FUEL/YEAR PRICE/GAL ($) COST/YEAR
EDGEWATER 2300 115 2.50-3.25 288-374
ORMOND BEACH 6900 345 2.50-3.25 863-1121
PIERSON 13800 690 2.50-3.25 1725-2243
TOTAL FUEL COST TO THE CITY/YEAR $2876-$3401
Keep in mind that a V6 Impala equipped as a pursuit vehicle can reach 100mph and costs about $20,000, and an SUV costs about $34,000. The Impalas used in Winter Park save a fortune in gas each year as a bonus. DUH! Why does NSB need pursuit vehicles anyway? Our department does not patrol the only interstate and the newest strategy for urban areas seems to be to use the radio, and not engage in high speed pursuits.
ose.