FIREFIGHTER BENEFITS NOW AND WHEN?
The City is currently in negotiations with the IAFF local. As usual the union is putting forth their demands and the City is responding. However, the Shadow believes the public should be aware of the salaries and benefits that form the baseline for these discussions. As you can see, their extant compensation package is very generous. We recommend that you review and analyze this information, and personally advise your commissioners as to how they should respond to the union’s demand for additional compensation, i.e., how much of your money should they give away?
CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH
FIREFIGHTER BENEFITS
Health/Dental Insurance
City pays 100% for employee and 0% for dependent coverage.
Health
Employee has choice of Florida Health Care (HMO) or Aetna (QPOS).
Dental
Pacific Mutual – 2 cleanings and 1 x-ray/year. 80% Preventative – 50% Major.
Life Insurance
City pays 1 x your annual salary (max. $100,000).
Supplemental Life Insurance per State of Florida. (in line of duty only).
Short Term Disability
If employee is injured off the job, employee has 2 week waiting period and then is paid for up to 13 weeks of disability. Maternity leave is treated as any other illness, but is generally paid for 4 weeks after the 2 week waiting period unless the doctor states otherwise. (2/3 City, 1/3 Employee PL time).
Retirement
Defined Benefit Plan through The City of New Smyrna Beach Fire Pension Board. Normal retirement is age 55 and completion of 10 years of service or 25 years service at any age. Earn 3% credit per service year. Employee pays 1% of salary. Employee contributions are considered qualified (tax exempt).
Personal Leave
Employee will accrue 202 hours of personal leave in the first year up to 5 years. Accruals will increase with years of service. Employee can use one week of personal leave after 6 months.
Longevity
Employee will receive 24 hours of pay after 5 years of service. Longevity will increase as years of service increase.
Holidays
11 paid holidays (1 includes employees Birthday).
This article published last Jan 8, 2007, was originally submitted as a blog by a concerned, knowledgeable citizen
It is time the cities and county look at privatizing fire services-their salaries and benefits are out of control
Fire protection services today are provided by private firms in half of Denmark, much of Arizona, and a growing number of communities in Tennessee, Georgia, Oregon, and a number of other states. The success of private companies in providing quality fire protection services to these communities is consistent with the broader experience of private firms that operate in a competitive environment, and thus are capable of delivering a wide range of municipal services, at a lower cost than public- sector providers deliver. Whether private fire protection is provided on a subscription basis to individual home- and property owners, to a special district, by contract with municipal governments, or by contract with commercial airports, a common set of innovative, efficiency-enhancing practices is used. Fire protection services are highly labor-intensive and are characterized by long periods during which no calls or service take place. Thus, cost- effective practices generally focus on ensuring that fire service employees are utilized efficiently. The private sector has developed three key practices that set it apart from public-sector fire provision. These are:
(1) The use of a mixed force of full-time and reservist firefighters (so that fewer full-time salaries must be paid) and;
(2) Cross-training and multi-service provision, so that the same emergency-service personnel, equipment, and stations can provide more than one type of service, thereby spreading costs among all the offered services and
(3) A clear focus on fire prevention using both technology and public education approaches.
Another important way private fire companies reduce the cost of fire protection is by serving several communities. Costly firefighting and emergency apparatus that is needed only occasionally in any one jurisdiction might be shared among several service areas. Operating in many different localities also enables private firefighters to gain experience in a wide range of situations and utilize this knowledge to improve services and control costs. Thus, unlike municipal fire departments that generally operate within a single jurisdiction, private fire companies can operate across different counties, states, or nationwide, and thereby achieve significant economies. A number of independent studies have examined the cost and performance of private fire protection services, both in the United States and in Denmark. An examination of the private fire department in Scottsdale, Arizona found that, in comparison with nearby public-sector departments, it had the lowest per capita cost of fire service, and one of the lowest fire incidence and loss records. In Denmark, the cost of private fire services was found to be only one-third as much as publicly provided services. In the United States, the principal growth in private fire services has been in communities without pre-existing, full-time, paid municipal fire departments. These localities, which include rural and semi-rural areas without fire protection; small towns with volunteer departments; newly incorporated towns, cities, and fire districts; and planned communities, are expected to experience the greatest population growth and continue to offer the greatest growth opportunities for the industry. (Editor’s note, so why not New Smyrna?)
COMPARISON OF FIRE DEPARTMENTS
Last Fall,we published a comparison of fire departments for the three coastal cities and Deltona. Comparisons can be made by looking at statistics on web sites provided by each department, and looking at budget numbers from the appropriate City finance department. The statistics as we read them are as follows:
All of these jurisdictions perform many services which are not easy to characterize. There are HAZMAT calls, auto fires, trash fires,auto accidents, animal control and a host of other activities which are not identical in all communities where comparisons of general service is warranted. Nevertheless, it is apparent that general comparisons are warranted. In the case of New Smyrna Beach, comparisons with Port Orange seem relevant, but Deltona had a completely unacceptable response time for answering emergency calls and its service would seem inadequate even if its costs were cheaper. However, it is interesting to note comparisons for cost per firefighter, and firefighter cost per resident by city. Interesting is it not?