that directs spending your money on purchases like Dunn Lumber and Esther Street through its control of the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) which has the money. Millions of dollars of your money. It is this structure that must be addressed and it is this structure that has to be exposed and disinfected by exposure of the harm they do to the taxpayers. It may or may not change tomorrow. In this election, there is no assurance that even if the incumbents are defeated that any real change will occur in using tax money to take care of the Chamber’s friends until more of the taxpayers are disgusted with business as usual.
First, understand that the Chamber of Commerce does not oppose the City in spending money or mismanagement itself or the mismanagement at Bert Fish or the Utilities Commission. Putting aside the obvious problems with the over the top costs of the City employees, particularly the fire department and the police department, the major money siphoned from the City and currently supporting the excessive expenditures for salaries and projects are the Utilities Commission and the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA). The former operates almost with no over sight by the City Commission and it has the same excessive pay, pensions and benefits which you pay for through high electric and water rates. Think of $80,000 a year secretaries with pensions and benefits costing the UC probably another 45%--$35,000 in pensions and benefits. The CRA is controlled by the Chamber of Commerce directly (we count six of the seven board members). There is another pot of money at the end of the rainbow that they tap—the Southeast Volusia Advertising Association which uses its bed tax money ($300,000 this year) to support, not surprisingly, the Chamber ($36,000+ this year). It also supports events in town that do not put heads-in-beds and supports the projects of their friends—like the Safari Club. As an aside, the incoming President of the Chamber’s husband is on the CRA board.
In the greater scheme of things the Angler’s Club rip-off for 60 or so years is small potatoes as against the insidious and corrosiveness of the abused power of the Chamber and the people who run it for their own benefit. Sure the Angler’s Club discriminates in an era where this is not acceptable to our society. It makes the City look bad. Sure they have ripped us off, but that is history. You cannot get the cookies back that the three year old ate from the cookie jar, but you can keep the kid out of the cookie jar in the future. The Chamber’s raiding the cookie jar can and must be stopped. The CRA must not remain under the control of a bunch of Chamber members who buy needless and polluted and over priced property—Dunn Lumber and Ester Street. They must not stay in control of our tax money which is supposed to help blighted areas. Does it not say a lot about them that buy $9,000 plastic Christmas trees which should not be bought at any price?
It could not be worse than the scenario painted by an esteemed blogger. His or her BLOG suggest impropriety. If true, that also looks bad for the City:
10/27/2009, 8:17 am
Doug Hodson's money line
The CRA has indeed awarded $5K to the Italian restaurant and $7K to the Mexican restaurant [two restaurants that recently opened on Flagler and Canal]. Who is on the CRA, none other than Doug Hodson, the advertising director of the Observer who is now going to swoop in and collect advertising from both? Hodson also is [on] the S.E. Volusia Advertising Authority, both clearly conflicts of interest. Too bad our mayor ignores such conflicts and the CRA spending machine moves on unabated. Who is Mr. Hodson's boss? You got it -- Mr. Conflict of Interest Bob Lott, owner of the Observer, head of the Chamber and formerly of the hospital board. Guess what, Bob Lott's Chamber and Observer moderator Bob Burns will be running the Chamber candidates debate. The Mayor takes her orders from Bob Lott.”
If anyone solicits money from a business based on his friends in high places having given the business grants, it is improper. Or maybe just an arrangement that is simply not fair to the taxpayers. Besides, there is nothing illegal about a paper selling advertising. Right?
But the most scandalous aspect of the Chamber is not the excess of spending taxpayer money for their friends. It is much worse because the reason for its existence is to represent the business community, and they have not done that. If they were true to their asserted conservative beliefs they would be in the fore front to reform the Utilities Commission to lower the utility costs for their failing business friends on Canal and Flagler. They would be screaming for cuts in the pay, pensions, and benefits of City employees in order to lower property taxes which are killing their members. They should be paying a fair maintenance feetal for their building and maintain the building. No, no rent and not a word on issues that adversely affects its members. And the biggest irony is that their current President, Robert Lott, argued for higher taxes as a Board member at Bert Fish instead of demanding reasonable management and reducing management salaries to reflect that the economy has declined. In sum, they do not represent their members but support all of the crummy bad management and bad tax schemes which hurt the members of their drinking club.
Voting tomorrow is not between the status quo and reform. That hopefully will come in the future. But seeing the future in New Smyrna Beach now could be like driving down a dark road without headlights. Regardless of who wins tomorrow the issues have been put on the table this time and the choice is no longer just “mirror, mirror on the wall, who is fairest of us all?” We believe that whoever wins will have to reorganize the fire and police departments, reign in the pay, pension and benefits of all City employees, and not buy needless polluted properties or prime sea shore property at inflated prices. They must stop the anti-growth nonsense that has choked off all meaningful development and destroyed our future tax base. As a start, Williams, Steve Dennis, and Doug Hodson, who works directly for Bob Lott’s Observer, should be requested to resign immediately from the CRA. If something is not done about these issues, we believe that they will be short lived incumbents and re-call petitions could be filed against the rest.