1.Management goals
The Clueless threesome has come up with the following “goals” for both the City Manager and Attorney. Whoops, we, your City Commissioners, do not have any “goals” yet because they are reviewing the last year of the Shadow Archives to see if there are any ways to cut spending. Back to you next week after they have decided that Hagood was derelict in not telling them how to cut spending and they have found that the fire department pension plan is crazy. Cindy told them.
We figure the Commission will give a go ahead to the City manager to do what he wanted to do for the last couple of years and which they would not let him do. The Shadow has a few goals which we think are better:
Hagood
1. Find a surgeon who can give the clueless threesome a brain implant that will
permit them to understand budgets and spending cuts;
2. Find an appropriate course of instruction that can explain to the three of them the
word “hypocrisy” (In Richenberg’s case, this would probably have to be a three month
course because of the current low level of thought processes).
Gummey
1.Take a course in not giving legal advice unless asked. As a corollary, shut up
immediately when told to do so by Plaskett;
2. Give no opinion that could prevent some legal mistake on the part of the
Commission that could cost money, like advising them that a vote could trigger a
contract clause that could cost hundreds of thousands dollars in punitive damages for
slander;
3. Never say anything about the Utilities Commission. It immediately triggers your
contract review.
2.Response to IAFF (International Association of Fire Fighters)
The IAFF appears to have started to respond to arguments advanced about staffing and public safety. This is welcome and is certainly better than the efforts that we think some of its members may have used in the past to screw up the bulletin board (our BLOG).Now while the Shadow was going to prepare a response, one of our readers took a stab at it first and it is set out below.
BY a reader:
“9:25 AM You noted, "When you reduce staffing it leads to closing of fire stations. I believe that is one of the most important questions when establishing an insurance fee for your home. How far away is the closest station, hydrant, the staffing at that station? With a reduction in these services taxes will go up accordingly. My point being, you will not save money. It will ultimately cost you more.".........WELL, YOU'RE NOT ENTIRELY CORRECT......First of all, it all depends on your individual Insurance Company and how they evaluate risks. Secondly, your ISO rating is based on several things, the fire department being just one of them, which accounts for just 50 percent of the total rating. The other issues evaluated in the ISO's Fire Suppression Rating are the city's emergency communications systems and its water supply.......So, one could argue that closing a Fire Station, or reducing staff, wouldn't have any effect on your Insurance costs at all.....after all, you could still dial 911, and you would still have your fire hydrants. And those two things make up 50 percent of your fire rating.....And the difference between a 4 min response time and 6 minutes response time in the event of a fire, hasn't really made a big difference here; Lets face it; every house that has caught on fire here in NSB in recent memory has been declared a TOTAL LOSS anyway! So, what kind of emphasis do you think your Insurance Company really puts on that? PROBABLY NOT MUCH.....Its more likely your insurance company is interested in how old your house is, and what its constructed of, then whether our Heroes in the FD can get to it in 4 minutes ............Now, how can we reduce staff without effecting our City Fire Rating? Well, the first thing we need to look at are the people who aren't on Engine Duty to begin with; The Chief, the Deputy Chief, the Fire Marshall, the Battalion Commanders, and of course, our FD's platoon of LT's.......Losing a few of these "Hangers-on" would have a pretty minimal effect on our fire ratings.....but they DO have a BIG effect on our City's Fire Budget. And that should make them all WALKING TARGETS when the City's Budget comes up for discussion next year.....And why we need 12 LT's in the FD is still a mystery to me! Can anybody justify this? The word LARD comes to mind......also is the notion that we're just giving these people fancy titles, ( and money) to make them LOOK important. Again, Can anybody justify this?”
Now the Shadow would add that no stations were added to our knowledge when the staffing level was raised to three to a shift and none will be closed if the manning level is returned to two to a shift. At least seven stations in the County operate with two to a shift and the statistics for the county show no difference in public safety between the seven and the other 15.
The primary ISO insurance basic standards are adequate water pressure in hydrants, a water supply that is within five hundred feet and no more than five miles from the nearest fire station. If you meet these criteria, you get between a 4-6 and there is no change in insurance rates.