PLATITUDES AND PABULUM, WILL THEY ADDRESS THEM?
ISSUES FOR OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS
(FIRST PUBLISHED JULY 16, 2006, Revised)
No more beauty contests for electing our Mayor and Commissioners. That was the position of the Shadow last July and the Shadow was disappointed that this election was no different than those in the past--platitudes and pabulum for the masses. We were disappointed that the only candidate willing to talk about issues was the newby, Thomas C. Kelly, and not only did the local newspapers do him in, but he was not impressive in his first outing and did poorly in the first so-called debate. So much for a campaign on the issues. No other candidate took a public position on any of the issues, and all of their public statements were couched in generalities, such as how they were going to listen to the public and do what was right. Claiming that the incumbent had real estate deals that they thought were inside jobs is not corruption, and is usually reserved for stealing hundreds of millions of dollars in the manner of Boss Tweed (Tammany Hall).
The time has arrived for a serious discussion of how we are going to fix the problems now facing the City, and how we are going to restructure the spending machine so that employee compensation is fair and not excessive, that pensions are reasonable for the services rendered, that construction and maintenance costs for facilities we want, like the sports arena and the municipal golf course, are consistent with what citizens believe are reasonable subsidies and within the limits of our budgets. The biggest problems are transparency, as well as the willingness to reexamine decisions when new facts are presented that call for revisiting issues--like the needless new fire house and the tortured path of the decision on just fixing the Pavilion at the Beach at Flagler.
We have a crisis in spending because of bad planning, when decisions were made over the last five years to spend the windfall from increases in property values rather than only spend increases that flowed from the increases assessed on homestead properties. If they had limited expenditures to only a three percent factor over inflation for non homestead as well as homestead, we would not be in the current fiscal conundrum. Over five years the City spent 35% more than inflation with an adjustment for growth. It also over built the Sports Complex and threw away, it seems, $3.5 million on the golf course.
1. Budget and Spending:
The Commission should adopt Governor Crist's planned reduction in spending. Namely, the level of expenditures in 2001, increased by inflation and a factor to account for population growth. This formula yields a conclusion that the City of New Smyrna Beach has spent more almost 35% more than it should have, mostly for salary and pension increases for employees and for programs like the sports complex and the “loan” to the municipal golf course. It is long past the time when our elected officials should brag about not reducing wages for City employees or eliminating City jobs. The reductions this year of 10% on the millage rate went part way toward governor Crist's objective, but instead of funding all of it from spending cuts, they used reserves, taxes paid in the past. Before they do that again they should have an independent study as to whether the reserves can or should have been reduced. Those reserves are there for an emergency and we live in a pyroclastic and hurricane prone environment. We suggest more spending cuts are more appropriate than using the reserves.
2. Taxes:
The millage rate should be cut back commensurate with meaningful cut backs in spending. We already know that the rise for homestead is 2.1% in the property tax. Bert Fish raised its millage rate (see Note today). The City and County listened to your protests, but the current mandated cuts of 10% and in the City's millage rate has not required the City to do more than switch to eating diet food for a few months.
3. Capitol Expenditures
There should be a moratorium on construction of the needless fire station and the over the top design on the police station. With budget and spending cuts, these buildings represent an annual cost of over $1 million dollars in service costs on the bonds for over 30 years. With the sports complex running large annual deficits, and the unlikelihood of the municipal golf course going off the dole, construction of these buildings makes no sense at this time. Yes, the referendum to build them was passed, but the fire department map showing no increase in response time from the current station on Columbus avenue was never presented even to City management before the Shadow demanded it, and there was no discussion of how little it would cost ($25,000 if the private sector did it, at least double that if government does, but still a bargin) to refurbish that station. They can balance the budget and cut the millage rate almost in half this year by not building it.
4 The Utilities Commissioners
The next big issue is what has happened to our Utilities Commission. This administration has the opportunity to fix what they broke. The Shadow looks at the current Utilities Commissioners as a wrecking crew, whether deliberate as some believe or merely incompetent. Recently we find that at the same time they have turned the place from one of the best and most efficiently run municipal utilities into one with almost the highest rates in the State, they have been adding employees at an alarming rate, while reducing services. Astonishing! What is more astonishing is that the Chairman, Richard Spangler, is the hubby of the Mayor-elect.
5. Growth was and is the Non-Issue, unless you really voted for going back to a 1950's sleepy fishing village with no condominiums on what is left of the beach. If so, you should be careful of what you wish for.
A. The Beach:
Growth was not a real issue in this election. We made decisions a half a century ago and now we must live with the results. Some believe they were ill advised. Others want to protect the existing flow of water through the inlet for surfers, some find that beach renourishment as expensive and unnecessary, and others, mostly beach front owners, see it as not only protection for their property and its value but a necessary part of what makes New Smyrna Beach the gem of Volusia County. The effort to limit reconstruction of existing facilities is an issue that will likely be played out in court, and limitations on density, will likely be played out there as well.
B. Sub Divisions:
We have cast the die by annexing lands West of I-95 and changed the growth equation for the City forever. Venetian Bay is where we crossed the River Rubicon. Talk all you want, but we exact large development costs for infrastructure improvements in these sub divisions, and we tax them while providing almost no services for the next 20 years. It is like dope to the City, addictive and debilitating at the same time. It is unlikely that any road in Venetian Bay will need repair for the next 20 years, but the owners out there will cross subsidize road repairs for the rest of the City. Folks that is one of the reasons for growth. There will be more commercial centers, and the current plan for seven traffic lights between I-95 and Mission, on SR 44 will make it look like Lake Mary Avenue in Sanford. This growth will ebb and flow according to many factors that we can control, but we can adjust the level and the timing through demands like adequacy of roads and availability of schools,